UNITED STATES v. RUSHLIGHT AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO.

Civ. No. 10084.

179 F.Supp. 434 (1959)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. RUSHLIGHT AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO., Defendant.

United States District Court D. Oregon.

November 4, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. E. Luckey, U. S. Atty., Harold E. Patterson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Portland, Or., for plaintiff.

Denton G. Burdick, Jr., and Hutchinson, Schwab & Burdick, Portland, Or., for defendant.


KILKENNY, District Judge.

This cause is before the Court on the motion of each party for a summary judgment.

The facts are as follows:

Defendant, in April, 1956, filed with the plaintiff an application for a refund of $12,024.90 on a claimed overpayment of income taxes for the fiscal year ended October 31, 1953, due to a loss carryback arising in 1955, and carried back to 1953. In July, 1956, the District Director for Oregon approved defendant's application...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases