HOGLUND v. CITY OF SUMMIT


28 N.J. 540 (1959)

147 A.2d 521

NILS HOGLUND, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF SUMMIT, A MUNICIPALITY OF THE COUNTY OF UNION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND SUMMIT CIVIC FOUNDATION, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, INTERVENING-DEFENDANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 5, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Samuel A. Bloom argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Harry Silverstein and Samuel A. Bloom, attorneys).

Mr. Joseph H. Stamler argued the cause for the defendants-respondents Summit Civic Foundation and City of Summit (Messrs. Lorentz & Stamler, attorneys for defendant-respondent Summit Civic Foundation; Mr. Peter C. Triolo, attorney for defendant-respondent City of Summit; Mr. Richard M. Goldman, on the brief).


The opinion of the court was delivered by BURLING, J.

This is a taxpayers' suit challenging the validity of an ordinance of the City of Summit. The ordinance proposes to lay out, open and establish a street known as Dennis Place, and authorizes the improvement of the street, including the installation of storm and sanitary sewers. The Superior Court, Law Division, entered an order for a summary judgment in favor of the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases