1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 171 F.Supp.
  5. 171 F.Supp. 343 (1959)
 

SPERRY RAND CORP. v. BELL TELEPHONE LABORATORIES, INC.

171 F.Supp. 343 (1959)

SPERRY RAND CORPORATION, John Presper Eckert, Jr., and John W. Mauchly, Plaintiffs, v. BELL TELEPHONE LABORATORIES, INCORPORATED, Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

March 19, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Byerly, Townsend, Watson & Churchill, New York City, for plaintiffs. C. Blake Townsend, New York City, William D. Hall, Washington, D. C., Joseph B. Forman, Carroll G. Harper, New York City, of counsel.

Henry R. Ashton, New York City, for defendant. Harry R. Pugh, Jr., New York City, of counsel.

DAWSON, District Judge.

This is a motion by plaintiffs for leave to amend their complaint.

The action has been brought pursuant to the provisions of 35 U.S.C.A. § 146 by a party dissatisfied with the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences "on the question of priority."*

The papers show that this lawsuit involves the patentability of certain alleged inventions relating to an electronic numerical integrator and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases