1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 219 Or.
  5. 219 Or. 280 (1959)
 

MARTINSON ET AL v. ANDREWS

219 Or. 280 (1959)

347 P.2d 53

MARTINSON ET AL v. ANDREWS

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed December 2, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas E. Cooney, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Walter J. Cosgrave and Maguire, Shields, Morrison & Bailey, Portland.

Paul R. Meyer, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were King, Miller, Anderson, Nash & Yerke, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, SLOAN and KING, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

SLOAN, J.

This is a suit to require an accounting. The plaintiffs are the owners of contractual rights to fractional shares of the proceeds derived from inventions conceived and patented by defendant Andrews. The trial court required defendant Andrews to account and, as a result of the accounting, awarded judgment against him in favor of both plaintiffs. The defendant Andrews appeals. The suit against the defendant A.M. Andrews Company, a corporation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases