1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 170 F.Supp.
  5. 170 F.Supp. 234 (1959)
 

CORDERO v. PANAMA CANAL COMPANY

170 F.Supp. 234 (1959)

Raul CORDERO, Plaintiff, v. PANAMA CANAL COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

January 21, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard Rolnick, New York City, for plaintiff.

Arthur H. Christy, U. S. Atty., New York City, Benjamin Berman, New York City, of counsel, for defendant.

BICKS, District Judge.

The issue presented on this motion is whether the Federal Employees Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 751 et seq.1 affords the sole and exclusive remedy to plaintiff against his employer the defendant, Panama Canal Company, for injuries sustained in the course of his employment as a member of the crew of the S. S. Ancon, a vessel owned and operated by it. The defendant's argument in the main is that it is an agency...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases