1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 176 F.Supp.
  5. 176 F.Supp. 210 (1959)
 

RUNKLE v. BIRKMEYER

No. 2598.

176 F.Supp. 210 (1959)

Harry M. RUNKLE v. Joseph D. BIRKMEYER, John L. McCarty, H. J. Bice, Hugo H. Loewenstern and Paula Hassenpflug.

United States District Court N. D. Texas, Amarillo Division.

New Trial Granted November 5, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John L. Smith and Mark S. Smith, Lubbock, Tex., for plaintiff.

McCarthy, Rose & Haynes, Amarillo, Tex., and Adkins, Folley, McConnell & Hankins, Amarillo, Tex., for J. D. Birkmeyer.

Simpson, Clayton & Fullingim, Amarillo, Tex., for John L. McCarty.

Gibson, Ochsner, Harlan, Kinney & Morris, Amarillo, Tex., for Hugo H. Loewenstern.

E. Byron Singleton, Amarillo, Tex., for H. J. Bice and Paula Hassenpflug.

New Trial Granted November 5, 1959. See 177 F.Supp. 877.

BENJAMIN C. DAWKINS, Sr., District Judge.

The circumstances out of which this litigation arose began with an exchange of letters between plaintiff and one H. J. Bice, a real estate dealer residing in Amarillo, Texas. They had known each other for about five years, and from the first letter by Bice to Runkle at his home...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases