1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 169 F.Supp.
  5. 169 F.Supp. 158 (1959)
 

KALART COMPANY v. UNITED STATES

Civ. No. 4907.

169 F.Supp. 158 (1959)

KALART COMPANY, Inc. v. UNITED STATES of America.

United States District Court D. Connecticut.

January 14, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard C. Ross, New York City, Charles Alperin, White Plains, N. Y., for plaintiff.

Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., James P. Garland, Benjamin H. Pester, Philip R. Miller, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Harry W. Hultgren, Jr., U. S. Atty., Dist. of Conn., Hartford, Conn., W. Paul Flynn, Asst. U. S. Atty., Dist. of Conn., New Haven, for defendant.

ANDERSON, District Judge.

This is an action to recover $9,590.60 paid by the plaintiff as excise taxes on photographic equipment sold by it between January 29th and October 29th, 1951 to Craig Co., its sole West Coast distributor. About October 1, 1951 the plaintiff and the Craig Co. (hereinafter called "Craig") became aware that on November 1, 1951 the manufacturer's Excise Tax on photographic equipment would either be removed or reduced by the Federal taxing authorities...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases