CORO BROKERAGE, INC. v. RICKARD


29 N.J. 295 (1959)

148 A.2d 817

CORO BROKERAGE, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MADLYN RICKARD AND JAMES RICKARD, D/B/A GROVE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 10, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Thomas E. Weinstock argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Bendit & Weinstock, attorneys).

Mr. Michael H. Hochman argued the cause for the respondents (Mr. Abraham Miller, attorney).

Mr. David M. Satz, Jr., argued the cause for Mr. David D. Furman, Attorney General, amicus curiae.

Mr. Edward Krowen argued the cause for Insurance Brokers Association of New Jersey, amicus curiae (Mr. Lewis C. Stanley, on the brief).

Mr. Harold D. Feuerstein and Mr. Marvin A. Sachs filed a brief for New Jersey Association of Insurance Agents, amicus curiae.


The opinion of the court was delivered by PROCTOR, J.

The plaintiff appealed to the Appellate Division of the Superior Court from a judgment which the Hudson County District Court had entered in favor of the defendants. We granted certification under R.R. 1:10-1(a).

The plaintiff, a New York corporation, is an insurance broker and licensed to do business in New Jersey. The defendants, James Rickard and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases