1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Haw.
  4. 43 Haw.
  5. 43 Haw. 277 (1959)
 

HARRINGTON v. BISHOP TR. CO. ET AL.

No. 4072.

43 Haw. 277 (1959)

E. ESTELLE HARRINGTON v. BISHOP TRUST COMPANY, LIMITED, AND REGINA BORNSTEIN HARRINGTON.

Supreme Court of Hawaii.

Decided May 25, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard K. Sharpless (Lewis, Buck & Saunders with him on opening brief; no reply brief filed) for intervening defendant-appellant.

Frank D. Padgett (Robertson, Castle & Anthony with him on the brief) for plaintiff-appellee.

Smith, Wild, Beebe & Cades (Wm. B. Borthwick) for defendant-appellee. (Filed no brief and did not argue.)

RICE, C.J., STAINBACK AND MARUMOTO, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT BY STAINBACK, J.

In 1944 Arthur S. and E. Estelle Harrington, then husband and wife, as settlors, executed a revocable trust deed wherein certain shares of stock belonging to the husband and other shares belonging to the wife were conveyed to the Bishop Trust Company, Limited, as trustee, with the settlors as beneficiaries.

In January 1947, Arthur and Estelle, contemplating divorce, entered into a settlement agreement, and in April 1947...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases