1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 220 Or.
  5. 220 Or. 73 (1959)
 

KRETZ ET UX v. HOWARD ET AL

220 Or. 73 (1959)

346 P.2d 93

KRETZ ET UX v. HOWARD ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed November 12, 1959.

Petition for rehearing denied January 26, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roy Harland, Salem, argued the cause for appellants. On the briefs were Long and McKechnie, Albany, and Rhoten, Rhoten & Speerstra, Salem.

Orval Thompson argued the cause for respondents. On the briefs were Weatherford & Thompson, Albany.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, O'CONNELL and REDDING, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

REDDING, J. (Pro Tempore)

This is a suit for specific performance of an oral contract for the sale of real and personal property, brought by Russell F. Kretz and Bertsie M. Kretz, husband and wife, as plaintiffs, against J. Francyl Howard and Mary Howard, his wife, and their two children, Maryan Howard and James Howard. Decree was entered in favor of defendants and plaintiffs appeal.

The plaintiffs contend that the defendants agreed to sell...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases