1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 172 F.Supp.
  5. 172 F.Supp. 107 (1959)
 

UNITED STATES v. GUERLAIN, INC.

172 F.Supp. 107 (1959)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. GUERLAIN, INC., Defendant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. PARFUMS CORDAY, INC., Defendant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. LANVIN PARFUMS, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

March 31, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard B. O'Donnell, New York City, by Joe F. Nowlin, New York City, for plaintiff.

Shearman, Sterling & Wright, New York City, by Charles C. Parlin, Jr., New York City, for Guerlain, Inc.

Rosenman, Goldmark, Colin & Kaye, New York City, by Gilbert S. Edelson, New York City, for Parfums Corday, Inc.

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, New York City, by Simon H. Rifkind, New York City, for Lanvin Parfums, Inc.

EDELSTEIN, District Judge.

After a successful prosecution of these suits in the District Court, and before argument of the appeals in the Supreme Court, the Government moved in the Supreme Court to vacate the judgments in order that, on remand, it might move for dismissals. The basis for this unusual and perhaps unique procedure is said to be a policy decision, arrived at only during the pendency of the appeals, that the main problem involved was inappropriate for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases