1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 29 N.J.
  5. 29 N.J. 239 (1959)
 

RIVER DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. LIBERTY CORP.

29 N.J. 239 (1959)

148 A.2d 721

RIVER DEVELOPMENT CORP., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE LIBERTY CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. DAVID D. FURMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AMICUS CURIAE, EDWARD J. O'MARA, AMICUS CURIAE, COUNSEL FOR PENNSYLVANIA R.R. COMPANY.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 2, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Louis B. LeDuc argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant.

Mr. Josiah E. DuBois, Jr., argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Messrs. DuBois and DuBois, attorneys).

Mr. David D. Furman, Attorney General of New Jersey, argued as amicus curiae, attorney pro se (Mr. Sidney Kaplan, Deputy Attorney General; Mr. Morton I. Greenberg, Legal Assistant, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

Subject to the qualifying comments to be set forth, the judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the comprehensive opinion of the Appellate Division, 51 N.J.Super. 447 (1958).

Under part VIII of the opinion it was declared that plaintiff's statutory authorization or license to reclaim the subaqueous land in question had been lost by abandonment. Ordinarily, a conclusion that a license in land has...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases