NUSOM ET UX v. FROMM ET UX


217 Or. 36 (1959)

340 P.2d 186

NUSOM ET UX v. FROMM ET UX

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed June 3, 1959.

Petition for rehearing denied July 1, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W.C. Winslow and Norman K. Winslow, of Salem, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellants.

Bruce Spaulding, of Portland, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Mautz, Souther, Spaulding, Denecke & Kinsey, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and LUSK, SLOAN and CRAWFORD, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

CRAWFORD, J. (Pro Tempore).

Plaintiffs sued at law to recover $7,000 paid to J.D. and Margaret Turnidge for the use and benefit of defendants. Defendants denied generally and plead estoppel arising from res judicata. Plaintiffs recovered judgment for $5,000. Judgment notwithstanding the verdict was entered in favor of defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.

In the one assignment of error three propositions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases