1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 29 N.J.
  5. 29 N.J. 210 (1959)
 

MEYNER v. BURLINGTON-BRISTOL BRIDGE CO.

29 N.J. 210 (1959)

148 A.2d 585

ROBERT B. MEYNER, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. BURLINGTON-BRISTOL BRIDGE COMPANY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS; DWIGHT, ROYALL, HARRIS, KOEGEL & CASKEY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Reargued January 19, 1959.

Decided February 16, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Frederick W.R. Pride, of the New York Bar, argued the cause pro hoc vice for the petitioner-appellant (Messrs. Milton M. and Adrian M. Unger, attorneys; Messrs. Frederick W.R. Pride and Donald J. Nugent, of counsel and on the brief).

Mr. Robert L. Hood argued the cause for the defendant-respondent Burlington County Bridge Commission (Messrs. Robert L. Hood and Thomas D. Begley, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by BURLING, J.

This is a claim for attorneys' fees alleged to be owing petitioner from a fund paid into the Superior Court, Chancery Division, following an action in New York instituted by receivers appointed pursuant to an order of the Superior Court, Chancery Division, 10 N.J.Super. 545, entered in accordance with the mandate of this court in Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases