1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 171 F.Supp.
  5. 171 F.Supp. 47 (1959)
 

UNITED STATES v. STARLING

Cr. Nos. 3973, 3909, Civ. Nos. A-15159, A-14734.

171 F.Supp. 47 (1959)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Everett STARLING, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Rolland THOMAS and Floyd Curnutt, Defendants. Thomas P. GRAHAM, Jr., Regional Director of the Nineteenth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL UNION 1281, AFL-CIO, Respondent. Robert WOLFE, Margaret Wolfe, Ray G. Wolfe, Esther Wolfe, Warren Dice, Phyllis Dice, Kyle Gaylor and Bette Gaylor, partners d/b/a Wolfe's Department Store, Plaintiffs, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant.

District Court, Alaska Third Division, Anchorage.

February 21, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Crim. Nos. 3973, 3909:

George F. Boney, Asst. U. S. Atty., Anchorage, Alaska, for plaintiff.

T. Stanton Wilson, Wilson & Wilson, Anchorage, Alaska, and Wendell P. Kay, Anchorage, Alaska, for defendant Starling.

Raymond E. Plummer and James J. Delaney, Plummer & Delaney, Anchorage, Alaska, for defendants Thomas and others.

Civ. No. A-15,159:

Charles M. Henderson, Atty., N. L. R. B., Seattle, Wash., George F. Boney, Asst. U. S. Atty., Anchorage, Alaska, for petitioner.

Gordon W. Hartlieb, Hartlieb, Groh & Rader, Anchorage, Alaska, for respondent.

Civ. No. A-14,734:

David H. Thorsness, Davis, Hughes & Thorsness, Anchorage, Alaska, for plaintiffs.

James J. Delaney, Plummer & Delaney, Anchorage, Alaska, for defendant.

McCARREY, District Judge.

These cases come before the court on a motion to dismiss based upon the grounds that since Alaska was admitted to the Union as a state on the 3d day of January 1959, by presidential proclamation, the United States District Court for the Territory of Alaska is now without federal jurisdiction over criminal and civil matters arising under the laws of the United States.

The court, on its own motion, ordered the above four cases consolidated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases