1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 171 F.Supp.
  5. 171 F.Supp. 37 (1959)
 

OSBORN v. SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY

Civ. No. 9769.

171 F.Supp. 37 (1959)

S. Kriete OSBORN, Plaintiff, v. SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court D. Maryland.

February 24, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John S. McDaniel, Jr., Calhoun Bond, Cable & McDaniel, Baltimore, Md., for plaintiff.

David R. Owen, Wm. A. Fisher, Jr., Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, Baltimore, Md., for defendant.

THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

This is a private antitrust suit under 15 U.S.C.A. § 15. Plaintiff claims that his service station lease and dealer's sales agreement were cancelled by defendant (Sinclair) in furtherance of an attempt by Sinclair to monopolize the sale of tires, batteries and accessories (TBA) to its service station dealers in Maryland and/or a combination or conspiracy between Sinclair and Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (Goodyear) to restrain trade in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases