1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 54 N.J.
  5. 54 N.J. Super. 85 (1959)
 

GOLDFARB v. ROEGER

54 N.J. Super. 85 (1959)

148 A.2d 189

ABE GOLDFARB, TRADING AS A. GOLDFARB & SON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. WILLIAM D. ROEGER, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND WILLIAM D. ROEGER, SR. (AND WILLIAM D. ROEGER, JR.), TRADING AS C.F. ROEGER & SON, AND C.F. ROEGER & SON, INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 3, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Theodore Tarter argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Hermann, Melnik and Lowengrub, attorneys).

Mr. Sam Weiss argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Jacob H. Bernstein, attorney).

Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and HANEMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, J.A.D.

This appeal is by one of the defendants below, William D. Roeger, Jr., from an order of the Superior Court, Law Division, denying for the second time, on rehearing, the defendant's motion to vacate and set aside a judgment by default entered on December 10, 1957 against William D. Roeger, Sr., and William D. Roeger, Jr., trading as C.F. Roeger & Son, and C.F. Roeger & Son, Inc. Roeger, Jr., seeks to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases