1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 192 F.Supp.
  5. 192 F.Supp. 903 (1959)
 

ORTIZ v. GREYHOUND CORPORATION

Civ. A. No. 10312.

192 F.Supp. 903 (1959)

Jose ORTIZ v. GREYHOUND CORPORATION, and Frank Robert Liberati.

United States District Court D. Maryland, Civil Division.

August 24, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard M. Goldstein, Holniker & Wolf, Baltimore, Md., for plaintiff.

Rollins, Smalkin, Weston & Andrew, Thomas G. Andrew, Baltimore, Md., for defendants.

CHESNUT, District Judge,

This is a suit to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been due to the negligence of the defendant. The case was permitted to go to the jury which found a verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $5,000. The defendant having moved for a directed verdict in its favor at the conclusion of the case, has renewed the motion now for a judgment in favor of the defendant n. o. v., but without also moving for a new trial.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases