1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 177 F.Supp.
  5. 177 F.Supp. 877 (1959)
 

RUNKLE v. BIRKMEYER

Civ. A. No. 2598.

177 F.Supp. 877 (1959)

Harry M. RUNKLE v. Joseph D. BIRKMEYER, John L. McCarty, H. J. Bice, Hugo H. Loewenstern and Paula Hassenpflug.

United States District Court N. D. Texas, Amarillo Division.

November 5, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John L. Smith and Mark Smith, Lubbock, Tex., for plaintiff.

McCarthy, Rose & Haynes, and Adkins, Folley, McConnell & Hankins, Amarillo, Tex., for J. D. Birkmeyer.

Simpson, Clayton & Fullingim, Amarillo, Tex., for John L. McCarty.

Gibson, Ochsner, Harlan, Kinney & Morris, Amarillo, Tex., for Hugo H. Loewenstern.

E. Byron Singleton, Amarillo, Tex., for H. J. Bice and Paula Hassenpflug.

BEN C. DAWKINS, Sr., District Judge.

On the 20th day of August 1959, this Court filed an opinion adjudicating the issue of liability between the plaintiff, Harry M. Runkle and the defendants therein sued, holding John L. McCarty and Joseph B. Birkmeyer, were indebted to Runkle for loss sustained in a transaction between Runkle and Birkmeyer by which the former transferred to the latter some 4,200 acres of land in the State of Arkansas, for 100,000 shares of the capital...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases