1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 172 F.Supp.
  5. 172 F.Supp. 878 (1959)
 

TOY IDEAS, INC. v. MONTGOMERY WARD & CO.

Civ. No. 10428.

172 F.Supp. 878 (1959)

TOY IDEAS, INC., and American Character Doll Corp. v. MONTGOMERY WARD & CO., Inc.

United States District Court D. Maryland.

May 6, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard W. Emory and Venable, Baetjer & Howard, Baltimore, Md., and Thomas J. Byrne, Jr., and Keith, Bolger, Isner & Byrne, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Lawrence Perin and Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, Baltimore, Md., and Nichol M. Sandoe and Emery, Whittemore, Sandoe & Dix, New York City, for defendant.

THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

This case involves the same patent which was held valid and infringed in Brock v. Brown, D.C.D.Md., 138 F.Supp. 628, affirmed Brown v. Brock, 4 Cir., 240 F.2d 723, namely, U. S. Patent No. 2,675,644 for a "weeping doll", issued April 20, 1954, to Senior et al. Those opinions contain a discussion of the prior art and of the method of operation of the Senior device, which need...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases