1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 267 F.2d
  5. 267 F.2d 772 (1959)
 

MINNESOTA MINING & MFG. CO. v. POLYCHROME CORP.

No. 12585.

267 F.2d 772 (1959)

MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. POLYCHROME CORPORATION et al., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.

June 11, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George N. Hibben, Chicago, Ill., Marvin C. Soffen, New York City, Davis, Lindsey, Hibben & Noyes, Chicago, Ill., Ostrolenk, Faber, Gerb & Soffen, New York City, of counsel, for appellant.

Edward A. Haight, Chicago, Ill., Harold J. Kinney, St. Paul, Minn., John W. Hofeldt, Chicago, Ill., Carpenter, Abbott, Coulter & Kinney, St. Paul, Minn., M. K. Hobbs, Winter Park, Fla., of counsel, for appellee.

Before HASTINGS, PARKINSON and KNOCH, Circuit Judges.

HASTINGS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal comes before us from an order of the district court denying a motion for an interlocutory injunction in a patent infringement action.

Plaintiff-appellee, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (Three M), brought suit in the district court against defendant-appellant, Polychrome Corporation (Polychrome) and three of its sales agents, for infringement of its Patent No. 2,714,066 covering presensitized metal lithographic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases