1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 166 F.Supp.
  5. 166 F.Supp. 684 (1958)
 

PARAMOUNT PICTURES CORPORATION v. HOLDEN

No. 638-58.

166 F.Supp. 684 (1958)

PARAMOUNT PICTURES CORPORATION, a corporation, Plaintiff, v. William HOLDEN; The Mirisch Company, Inc., a corporation; United Artists Corporation, a corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. California, Central Division.

October 13, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp, Los Angeles, Cal., by Arthur Groman, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff.

Belcher, Henzie & Fargo, Los Angeles, Cal., by Frank B. Belcher, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant William Holden.

Kaplan, Livingston, Goodwin & Berkowitz, Beverly Hills, Cal., by Eugene S. Goodwin, Beverly Hills, Cal., for defendant The Mirisch Co., Inc.

Gang, Tyre, Rudin & Brown, Los Angeles, Cal., by Martin Gang, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant United Artists Corporation.

YANKWICH, Chief Judge.

On June 26, 1958, plaintiff, Paramount Pictures Corporation, a New York corporation,—to be referred to as Paramount, —instituted an action for declaratory relief against William Holden, a well-known motion picture artist.1 Our jurisdiction is based solely on diversity.2

I

Brief Summary of the Pleadings

The original Complaint set forth a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases