MARSH, District Judge.
Defendant moved for a directed verdict which was not granted, and, after verdict and judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, moved to have judgment entered in accordance with the motion for a directed verdict, and, in the alternative, for a new trial.
The ground stated for a directed verdict was that there had been no proof of a violation of the Safety Appliance Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq. and the Interstate Commerce Commission...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.