1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 392 Pa.
  5. 392 Pa. 309 (1958)
 

NIRDLINGER v. SEIDEL

392 Pa. 309 (1958)

Nirdlinger, Appellant, v. Seidel.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

April 21, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Franklyn E. Conflenti, with him S.V. Albo, and M.E. Catanzaro, for appellant.

A. Leonard Balter, and Rubin & Balter, for appellee, were not heard.

Before JONES, C.J., BELL, CHIDSEY, MUSMANNO, ARNOLD, JONES and COHEN, JJ.

OPINION PER CURIAM, April 21, 1958:

Plaintiff, an architect, instituted an action in assumpsit in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County to recover commissions which the defendant allegedly agreed to pay him for his services. The case was submitted to a jury which returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $30,000. Defendant filed a motion for judgment n.o.v., which was refused by the court en banc, and for a new trial, which was granted for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases