HUBBARD v. HUBBARD


213 Or. 482 (1958)

324 P.2d 469

HUBBARD v. HUBBARD

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed April 23, 1958.

Petition for rehearing denied May 28, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tolbert H. McCarrol, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Tanner & Carney, Portland.

Gladys M. Everett, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

Before PERRY, Chief Justice, and LUSK, WARNER and KESTER, Justices.


REVERSED.

LUSK, J.

This appeal raises the question of the validity of a nunc pro tunc decree making an allowance for minor children in a divorce suit.

The parties are Caroline Hill Hubbard, the executrix of the estate of James W. Hubbard, deceased, who was the plaintiff in the divorce suit, and Pearl Hubbard Bootsman, formerly Pearl Hubbard, the defendant in such suit. The parties will be hereinafter referred...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases