1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 165 F.Supp.
  5. 165 F.Supp. 486 (1958)
 

MANAIA v. POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 9057.

165 F.Supp. 486 (1958)

George MANAIA et al., Plaintiffs, v. POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court D. Maryland.

September 24, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herbert M. Brune, Baltimore, Md., Sheldon E. Bernstein, Wilmer S. Schantz, Jr., Newmyer & Bress, Washington, D. C., R. Edwin Brown, Harper M. Smith, Rockville, Md., for plaintiffs.

Richard W. Emory, Robert R. Bair, Joseph France, Venable Baetjer & Howard, Baltimore, Md., William B. Jones, Hamilton & Hamilton, Washington, D. C., of counsel. Cornelius Means, Washington, D. C., for defendant and third party plaintiff.

R. DORSEY WATKINS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs have moved, and defendant has not opposed the motion, that the judgment be amended to include a ruling on defendant's alternative motion for a new trial. On the authority of Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Duncan, 1940, 311 U.S. 243, 253, 254, 61 S.Ct. 189, 85 L.Ed. 147, cited by plaintiffs and defendant, the motion is hereby granted.

In brief summary, the main grounds of defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases