1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 26 N.J.
  5. 26 N.J. 576 (1958)
 

STATE v. WITTENBERG

26 N.J. 576 (1958)

141 A.2d 57

STATE OF NEW JERSEY (BOARD OF HEALTH OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CLINTON), PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HENRY WITTENBERG AND HERMAN WITTENBERG, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 28, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. George Pellettieri argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Messrs. Pellettieri & Rabstein and Mr. Italo M. Tarantola, attorneys; Ruth Rabstein, on the brief).

Mr. Wesley L. Lance argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed for the reasons stated in the per curiam opinion of the Appellate Division reported in 50 N.J.Super. 74 (1957).

At the oral argument before us, appellants suggested that at the de novo appeal in the County Court, they were improperly precluded from offering certain factual proof bearing upon the issue of the constitutionality of the ordinance, because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases