1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 167 F.Supp.
  5. 167 F.Supp. 336 (1958)
 

DE VAN v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY

No. 353 of 1956.

167 F.Supp. 336 (1958)

William DE VAN v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY. GRACE LINE, INC., v. INDEPENDENT PIER COMPANY, Impleaded Respondent.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

October 28, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Milton M. Borowsky (of Freedman, Landy & Lorry), Philadelphia, Pa., for libellant.

Theodore Voorhees (of Barnes, Dechert, Price, Myers & Rhoads), Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent Pennsylvania R. Co.

Thomas E. Byrne, Jr. (of Krusen, Evans & Shaw), Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent Grace Line, Inc.

Francis A. Scanlan (of Kelly, Deasey & Scanlan), Philadelphia, Pa., for impleaded respondent Independent Pier Co.

VAN DUSEN, District Judge.

I. Findings of Fact

The trial judge makes the following findings of fact:

1. On or about December 20, 1954, libellant was in the employ of Independent Pier Company, impleaded respondent, as a longshoreman on the Philadelphia waterfront.

2. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, respondent, is a Pennsylvania corporation engaged, inter alia, in the transportation of goods upon navigable waters of this country in interstate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases