1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 160 F.Supp.
  5. 160 F.Supp. 318 (1958)
 

CENTRAL MANUFACTURING CO. v. B-M-K CORPORATION

Civ. A. No. 1692.

160 F.Supp. 318 (1958)

CENTRAL MANUFACTURING CO. et al., Plaintiffs, v. B-M-K CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court D. Delaware.

March 10, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Cooch, Connolly, Cooch & Bove, Wilmington, Del., C. Earl Hovey, Kansas City, Mo., and Robert I. Lipton, Bryant, Lipton, Strayhorn & Bryant, Durham, N. C., for plaintiffs.

Clarence W. Taylor, Hastings, Lynch & Taylor, Wilmington, Del., Edward B. Beale, Beale & Jones, Irving M. Tullar, Washington, D. C., and E. C. Shapley Highley, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

RODNEY, District Judge.

This matter originally concerned an action of declaratory judgment concerning the validity of a patent. The patent was held invalid. An appeal has been noticed and a bond of $250 has been filed, pursuant to, Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rule 73(c), 28 U.S.C.A., as set out in the footnote.1 Costs in the District Court have been taxed by the Clerk at $2,145.30 and no review as to such costs has been taken pursuant to Rule...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases