CITY OF HOBOKEN v. JARKA CORP.


26 N.J. 336 (1958)

139 A.2d 737

CITY OF HOBOKEN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE JARKA CORPORATION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT, AND DIVISION OF TAX APPEALS, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, RESPONDENT. CITY OF HOBOKEN, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, v. INTERNATIONAL TERMINAL OPERATING CO., INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, AND DIVISION OF TAX APPEALS, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 17, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Herbert H. Fine argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Raymond J. Lamb argued the cause for respondents, The Jarka Corporation and International Terminal Operating Co., Inc. (Messrs. Emory, Langan, Lamb & Blake, attorneys; Mr. Raymond J. Lamb, of counsel).

Mr. David D. Furman, Deputy Attorney-General, argued the cause for Division of Tax Appeals, Department of the Treasury (Mr. Grover C. Richman, Jr., Attorney-General of New Jersey, attorney).


The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

Two errors require reversal of the judgments of the Division of Tax Appeals.

The first is that the Division failed to follow the procedure set forth in Fifth Street Pier Corp. v. City of Hoboken, 22 N.J. 326 (1956), in that opportunity was not given to except to the panel report. It should be noted that the Division here took final action before we decided the Fifth...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases