1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 167 F.Supp.
  5. 167 F.Supp. 106 (1958)
 

MUSKIN SHOE CO. v. UNITED SHOE MACHINERY CORP.

Civ. No. 9717.

167 F.Supp. 106 (1958)

The MUSKIN SHOE COMPANY, a Maryland corporation, v. UNITED SHOE MACHINERY CORPORATION, a New Jersey corporation.

United States District Court D. Maryland.

September 22, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert L. Wright, Milton M. Gottesman, Washington, D. C., and Moses W. Rosenfeld, Baltimore, Md., for plaintiff.

Ralph M. Carson, Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Sunderland & Kiendl, New York City, and John Henry Lewin, Venable, Baetjer & Howard, Baltimore, Md., for defendant.

THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

In this action under sec. 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 15, plaintiff seeks to recover damages alleged to have been sustained as a result of defendant's violation of sec. 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 2. The court found such violation in United States v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., D.C.D.Mass., 110 F.Supp. 295, affirmed per curiam 347 U.S. 521, 74 S.Ct...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases