1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 166 F.Supp.
  5. 166 F.Supp. 78 (1958)
 

SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES

No. 7954.

166 F.Supp. 78 (1958)

SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Defendants.

United States District Court E. D. Louisiana, New Orleans Division.

September 2, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Bistline, Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

Ernest D. Grinnell, Jr., St. Louis, Mo., for intervening Railroad defendants.

Nuel D. Belnap, Chicago, Ill., for L. T. Barranger & Co.

John C. Danielson, Washington, D. C., for the United States.

B. Franklin Taylor, Jr., Washington, D. C., for the Interstate Commerce Commission.

Before WISDOM, Circuit Judge, and WRIGHT and DAWKINS, District Judges.

J. SKELLY WRIGHT, District Judge.

In this action, the Southern Railway System lines, hereafter called "Southern," seek to have set aside the report and order of the Interstate Commerce Commission in Docket No. I. & S. 6588, Cotton From the Southwest to Southern Territory, 302 I.C.C. 637.1 That order directed Southern to cancel the restrictive routing provisions which Southern had included in the tariff schedules establishing reduced...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases