1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 169 F.Supp.
  5. 169 F.Supp. 1 (1958)
 

BALDWIN-LIMA-HAMILTON CORP. v. TATNALL MEAS. SYS. CO.

Civ. A. No. 23505.

169 F.Supp. 1 (1958)

BALDWIN-LIMA-HAMILTON CORPORATION and Edward E. Simmons, Jr., Plaintiffs, v. TATNALL MEASURING SYSTEMS COMPANY and The Budd Company, Defendants.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

Reargument Denied December 26, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur Littleton and Robert C. McAdoo (of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius), Philadelphia, Pa., Walter J. Blenko, Sr., and Walter J. Blenko, Jr. (of Blenko, Hoopes, Leonard & Buell), Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Edward A. Hathaway, Waltham, Mass., for plaintiff Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.

Joseph W. Swain, Jr., and Thomas N. O'Neill, Jr. (of Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads), Philadelphia, Pa., Dexter N. Shaw and John C. Dorfman (of Howson & Howson), Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants.

STEEL, District Judge.

Simmons, a patentee, and his licensee, Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corporation (hereinafter "Baldwin") have sued The Budd Company (hereinafter "Budd") and its wholly owned subsidiary, Tatnall Measuring Systems Company (hereinafter "Tatnall"), for infringement of Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8 and 9 of Patent No. 2,292,549 (hereinafter "Simmons patent"). The patent relates to a gage for measuring strain in materials...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases