1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 26 N.J.
  5. 26 N.J. 82 (1958)
 

BOTTA v. BRUNNER

26 N.J. 82 (1958)

138 A.2d 713

NANCY BOTTA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT, v. HERMAN G. BRUNNER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 3, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Samuel A. Larner argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent and cross-appellant, Nancy Botta (Messrs. Budd, Larner & Kent, attorneys).

Mr. Robert Shaw argued the cause for defendant-respondent-appellant, Herman G. Brunner (Messrs. Shaw, Pindar, McElroy & Connell, attorneys).

Mr. Philip M. Lustbader argued the cause for defendant-respondent, Leo Frieband (Messrs. Schneider, Lustbader & Morgan, attorneys; Mr. George H. Harbaugh, of counsel).

The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.

Certification was granted to review the judgment in this motor vehicle negligence action.

The plaintiff, Nancy Botta, was a passenger in an automobile driven by the defendant, Herman G. Brunner, when it collided with a car operated by co-defendant Leo Frieband. She sued both drivers to recover damages for injuries and monetary losses suffered. Rose De Santis, another rider in the Brunner vehicle, brought...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases