1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 28 N.J.
  5. 28 N.J. 73 (1958)
 

GOSSCHALK v. GOSSCHALK

28 N.J. 73 (1958)

145 A.2d 327

EDDY GOSSCHALK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. FRANCISKA JOKL GOSSCHALK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 20, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Samuel A. Bloom argued the cause for the appellant.

Mr. Nicholas S. Schloeder argued the cause for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Schettino in the court below.

FRANCIS, J. (dissenting).

I dissent from the determination of the majority upon two grounds: (1) at the time this suit was instituted, the plaintiff did not have the necessary domiciliary qualifications and consequently the Superior Court was without jurisdiction; and (2) even assuming that jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases