SCOTT v. ERDMAN


9 Misc.2d 961 (1957)

Sam Scott, Doing Business as Aluminum and Stainless Steel Products, Respondent, v. Robert M. Erdman et al., Defendants, and Carol M. Erdman, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

December 13, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Melvin Sacks and Irving Koufax for appellant.

Francis S. Furey for respondent.

PETTE, HART and DI GIOVANNA, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

The promise to complete the draperies to the entire satisfaction of the defendant does not impute merely a reasonable satisfaction. The determination of the question as to whether the services of the plaintiff under the contract were satisfactory, belonged entirely to the defendant subject to no control from the courts (Ginsberg v. Friedman, 146 App. Div. 779, revg. 125 N.Y.S. 473; Diamond v. Mendelsohn, 156 App. Div. 636). The personal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases