1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 148 F.Supp.
  5. 148 F.Supp. 801 (1957)
 

McCALL v. UNITED ENGINEERING & FOUNDRY CO.

148 F.Supp. 801 (1957)

John Arthur McCALL, Plaintiff, v. UNITED ENGINEERING & FOUNDRY CO., Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

February 21, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Klonsky & Steinman, New York City, for plaintiff.

Garvey & Conway, New York City, for defendant, Joseph E. Soffey, New York City, of counsel.

DAWSON, District Judge.

This is a motion to strike as insufficient in law that part of defendant's answer asserting that the plaintiff is not the real party in interest. Defendant's answer has previously been sustained but plaintiff here, in effect, moves for reconsideration on the authority of Czaplicki v. The Heogh Silvercloud, 1956, 351 U.S. 525, 76 S.Ct. 946, 100 L. Ed. 1387.

In 1950 plaintiff sustained personal injury for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases