1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 148 F.Supp.
  5. 148 F.Supp. 715 (1957)
 

UNITED STATES v. HOUGHAM

Civ. No. 1423.

148 F.Supp. 715 (1957)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. E. B. HOUGHAM, individually and doing business as Bakers Motor Market; Owen Dailey, an individual, William E. Schwartze, an individual, and Eugean Leroy Hochstedler, an individual, Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. California, N. D.

January 18, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laughlin E. Waters, U. S. Atty., Max F. Deutz, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff.

Conron, Heard & James, Calvin H. Conron, Jr., Bakersfield, Cal., for defendants.

JERTBERG, District Judge.

On December 31, 1954, plaintiff filed its orginal complaint seeking judgment against the defendants for damages for fraudulent purchases of government property. The complaint was instituted under the provisions of Section 26(b) of the Surplus Property Act of 1944, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 1635(b), repealed and re-enacted as Section 209(b) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, 41 U.S.C.A. § 239(b), and re...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases