1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 312 P.2d
  5. 312 P.2d 514 (1957)
 

HOENSTINE v. ROSE

No. 9474.

312 P.2d 514 (1957)

Harry HOENSTINE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Stanford ROSE, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of Montana.

Decided June 11, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A.A. Merrill, Idaho Falls, Idaho, J.F. Emigh, Butte, for appellant. A. A. Merill argued orally.

Doepker & Burgess, Butte, Robert E. Doepker Boulder, for respondent. Robert E. Doepker argued orally.

ADAIR, Justice.

Action in tort for damages. On November 10, 1952, by complaint filed in the district court for Beaverhead County, Montana, Harry Hoenstine, as plaintiff, commenced this suit against the defendant, Standford Rose, to recover for damage done to plaintiff's automobile. From a judgment for the plaintiff entered on a jury's verdict, the defendant, Stanford Rose, has appealed specifying as error the trial court's refusal: (1) To grant defendant's motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases