LAVINO v. LAVINO


23 N.J. 635 (1957)

130 A.2d 369

ANNA LAVINO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. LIBERO LAVINO (ALSO KNOWN AS LEO LAVINO), JOSEPH CATTANEO AND MARGARET L. CATTANEO, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 25, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Louis Gluck argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant.

Mr. Archibald Kreiger argued the cause for the defendants-respondents Joseph Cattaneo and Margaret L. Cattaneo, his wife (Mr. Samuel L. Biber, attorney).


The opinion of the court was delivered by BURLING, J.

Anna Lavino, the plaintiff, filed a complaint in the Chancery Division of the Superior Court demanding that a conveyance from her husband, Libero Lavino, to Joseph and Margaret Cattaneo, all named defendants, be set aside and that an inchoate right of dower of the plaintiff be recognized in the realty. The complaint was dismissed on the ground that it failed to state a cause of action. Lavino v. Lavino,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases