1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 158 F.Supp.
  5. 158 F.Supp. 463 (1957)
 

WHITFIELD & SHESHUNOFF, INC. v. FAIRCHILD ENG. & A. CORP.

Civ. A. 14874, 17385.

158 F.Supp. 463 (1957)

WHITFIELD & SHESHUNOFF, Inc., Plaintiff, v. FAIRCHILD ENGINE & AIRPLANE CORPORATION, Defendant. FAIRCHILD ENGINE & AIRPLANE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. WHITFIELD & SHESHUNOFF, Inc., and Marshall G. Whitfield, Defendants.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

November 29, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Milton E. Schattman, New York City, and Gibson Yungblut, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Whitfield & Sheshunoff, Inc. and Marshall G. Whitfield.

Brumbaugh, Free, Graves & Donohue, New York City, Walter H. Free and John F. Neary, Jr., New York City, of counsel, for defendant, Fairchild Engine & Airplane Corp.

REEVES, District Judge.

While the pleadings and testimony in the above cases are extensive, yet the issue is simple and easily stated. The question involved is the right to use a patented process or processes in causing aluminum to adhere to steel or other metals. Both parties have rights as licensees, but in different fields. Fixing the boundaries of these fields constitutes the issue and judicial problem. The process or processes had been designated by the parties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases