1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 46 N.J.
  5. 46 N.J. Super. 527 (1957)
 

HAMMETT v. ROSENSOHN

46 N.J. Super. 527 (1957)

135 A.2d 6

JOHN E. HAMMETT, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. JAMES ROSENSOHN AND FLORENTINE R. ROSENSOHN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 7, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Francis E. Bright argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent and cross-appellant (Messrs. Dolan & Dolan, attorneys; Mr. Bright, of counsel).

Mr. Sam Weiss argued the cause for the defendants-appellants and cross-respondents (Mr. Weiss, attorney and of counsel).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, J.A.D.

The defendants appeal and the plaintiff cross-appeals from a judgment of the Chancery Division which determined the respective property rights of the parties and the effect of certain restrictions and easements relating to their properties in Byram Township, Sussex County, New Jersey.

The plaintiff, John Hammett, acquired by deed dated June 27, 1928, from Edward J. Barber and others, several parcels...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases