1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 155 F.Supp.
  5. 155 F.Supp. 409 (1957)
 

ROGERS v. UNITED STATES

Civ. No. 17354.

155 F.Supp. 409 (1957)

Louis ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. The UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

September 24, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Markewich, Rosenhaus & Beck, New York City, Samuel Beck, New York City, of counsel, for plaintiff.

Cornelius W. Wickersham, Jr., U. S. Atty., Brooklyn, Lloyd H. Baker, Asst. U. S. Atty., Brightwaters, N. Y., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., James P. Garland, Robert H. Showen, Washington, D. C., Attorneys, Department of Justice, for United States.

BRUCHHAUSEN, District Judge.

The defendant moves for an order under Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. Rule 12(b), 28 U.S.C.A., for dismissal of the complaint upon the ground that the Court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter.

The plaintiff instituted this action to recover the sum of $100, claimed to have been collected by the defendant from the plaintiff as part payment of the amount of $15,217.24, assessed as additional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases