1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 148 Cal.App.2d
  5. 148 Cal.App.2d 358 (1957)
 

CITY OF SAN PABLO v. CITY OF RICHMOND

Docket Nos. 17181, 17182, 17183.

148 Cal.App.2d 358 (1957)

306 P.2d 949

CITY OF SAN PABLO et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF RICHMOND et al., Respondents. COLLEGE HIGHLANDS, INC. (a Corporation) et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF SAN PABLO et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

February 8, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James P. O'Drain and Leland F. Reeves, City Attorneys (City of San Pablo), and Robert T. Anderson for Appellants.

Thomas M. Carlson, City Attorney (City of Richmond), Dana Murdock and Robert Eshleman for Respondents.

PETERS, P.J.

Lying near to the cities of Richmond and San Pablo is certain uninhabited territory that both cities covet, and each has attempted to annex. Several facets of the controversy have already been before the appellate courts. (People v. City of Richmond, 141 Cal.App.2d 107 [296 P.2d 351] — the so-called Pennington...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases