Per Curiam.
Appellant was convicted of speeding. At the conclusion of the testimony and after both sides had rested, the trial court examined appellant's driver's license which was not in evidence and commented on previous traffic violations therein set forth.
It was reversible error for the court to look at the license before conviction. Such practice should be scrupulously avoided in the future, since it is a clear violation of defendant's rights...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
