1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 23 N.J.
  5. 23 N.J. 436 (1957)
 

CARLL & RAMAGOSA, INC. v. ASH

23 N.J. 436 (1957)

129 A.2d 433

CARLL & RAMAGOSA, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; S.B. RAMAGOSA & SONS, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; MARTIN, LOUIS AND DONALD SCHWARTZ, T/A FUNCADE; SOL KANE KNOPMAN AND STANLEY J. DUTKIN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. ALBERT M. ASH, CARL HOFFMAN AND LYNN FORCUM, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 18, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. David M. Perskie argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Perskie & Perskie, attorneys).

Mr. David M. Satz, Jr., Deputy Attorney-General, argued the cause for the respondents (Mr. Grover C. Richman, Jr., Attorney-General of New Jersey, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by JACOBS, J.

The Chancery Division dismissed the plaintiffs' complaint which sought to restrain the county prosecutor and the local chiefs of police from interfering with the operation of their games along the boardwalk in Wildwood and North Wildwood, Cape May County. Thereafter the plaintiffs appealed to the Appellate Division and we certified the matter on our own motion.

The plaintiffs operate boardwalk games which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases