1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 212 Or.
  5. 212 Or. 225 (1957)
 

STEIN v. HANDY

212 Or. 225 (1957)

319 P.2d 935

STEIN v. HANDY

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed December 24, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul E. Geddes argued the cause for appellant. On brief were Geddes, Felker, Walton & Richmond, Roseburg.

Robert M. Stults, Roseburg, argued the cause for respondent. With him on brief was Daniel R. Dimick, Roseburg.

Before PERRY, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, LUSK, BRAND, McALLISTER and KESTER, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

ROSSMAN, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant, Ruby Handy, from an order of the circuit court which, upon the court's own motion set aside a judgment and granted a new trial. The vacated judgment gave effect to a verdict which the jury returned in favor of the plaintiff, Dorothy Stein, in the sums of $1.00, general damages, and $399.55, special damages.

The action which the plaintiff, Dorothy Stein, instituted was to recover damages for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases