L. H. ESTATES CO. v. BARTHOLOMEW


9 Misc.2d 116 (1957)

L. H. Estates Co., Appellant, v. Joyce Bartholomew et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

March 28, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Abraham J. Yasgour for appellant.

Hyman Bravin for respondents.

STEUER and HECHT, JJ., concur; HOFSTADTER, J., concurs in result.


Per Curiam.

Defendants are statutory tenants under a lease which has expired. The lease contains a provision that the tenant shall not install or use a washing machine without the written consent of the landlord and that a breach of this provision shall be deemed a substantial violation of the lease.

This case presents three questions: (1) Where a lease provides that a specific act is a substantial violation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases