1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 144 F.Supp.
  5. 144 F.Supp. 776 (1956)
 

KUFFLER v. LIST

144 F.Supp. 776 (1956)

Harry KUFFLER, Plaintiff, v. Albert A. LIST, Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

October 2, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Schreiber, Klein & Opton, New York City, for plaintiff, Copal Mintz, Robert J. Sands, New York City, of counsel.

O'Brien, Driscoll & Raftery, New York City, for defendant, Arthur F. Driscoll, William D. Friedmann, New York City, of counsel.

DAWSON, District Judge.

This is a motion by the defendant under Rule 56 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. for summary judgment on the principal ground that the two causes of action alleged in the complaint are unenforceable because of the provisions of § 31 of the Personal Property Law of the State of New York, McK. Consol.Laws, c. 41.

The first cause of action alleged in the complaint asserts that the plaintiff suggested to defendant that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases