1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 41 N.J.
  5. 41 N.J. Super. 47 (1956)
 

CLARY v. BOROUGH OF EATONTOWN

41 N.J. Super. 47 (1956)

124 A.2d 54

EDMUND B. CLARY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE BOROUGH OF EATONTOWN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 10, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Merritt Lane, Jr., argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. McCarter, English & Studer and Mr. Eugene M. Haring, attorneys).

Mr. Lawrence A. Carton, Jr., argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Messrs. Roberts, Pillsbury & Carton, attorneys).

Before Judges FREUND, CONFORD and SCHETTINO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, J.A.D.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Law Division, sustaining the validity, as against the plaintiff, of a zoning ordinance adopted by the defendant borough November 10, 1954. The ordinance effects widespread revision of residential zoning throughout the municipality, principally by creating a scale of zones based upon minimum lot area and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases